<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brief Fable for Our Time, Maybe, from the WIP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnesimpson.com/blog/2009/04/brief-fable-for-our-time-maybe-from-the-wip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnesimpson.com/blog/2009/04/brief-fable-for-our-time-maybe-from-the-wip/</link>
	<description>Ridiculous Pursuits, Solemn Matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:51:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://johnesimpson.com/blog/2009/04/brief-fable-for-our-time-maybe-from-the-wip/comment-page-1/#comment-5116</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnesimpson.com/blog/?p=4158#comment-5116</guid>
		<description>Moonie: Just one more reason for us to be glad you&#039;re not a Welsh brewmaster!

froog: Thanks so much -- this &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; a WIP, after all, and I&#039;m unsurprised to find sore thumbs protruding! (Especially appreciated the inverted commas around &quot;overwriting,&quot; a grace you needn&#039;t have granted. :)

Both of those ReCaptchas sound like the names of mob hangers-on. The first &quot;Scrimps&quot; would be the Boss&#039;s astrologer; the second, his librarian. 

My own word pair is &lt;em&gt;barbing kibitzer&lt;/em&gt;, but please don&#039;t read anything into that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moonie: Just one more reason for us to be glad you&#8217;re not a Welsh brewmaster!</p>
<p>froog: Thanks so much &#8212; this <em>is</em> a WIP, after all, and I&#8217;m unsurprised to find sore thumbs protruding! (Especially appreciated the inverted commas around &#8220;overwriting,&#8221; a grace you needn&#8217;t have granted. :)</p>
<p>Both of those ReCaptchas sound like the names of mob hangers-on. The first &#8220;Scrimps&#8221; would be the Boss&#8217;s astrologer; the second, his librarian. </p>
<p>My own word pair is <em>barbing kibitzer</em>, but please don&#8217;t read anything into that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: froog</title>
		<link>http://johnesimpson.com/blog/2009/04/brief-fable-for-our-time-maybe-from-the-wip/comment-page-1/#comment-5113</link>
		<dc:creator>froog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnesimpson.com/blog/?p=4158#comment-5113</guid>
		<description>Skirting a bit close to &quot;overwriting&quot;, I think, John.  Probably deliberate - but might be straying a tad too far.  I can&#039;t think of many circumstances in which &#039;headgear&#039; is an acceptable substitute for &#039;hat&#039;.  Even if you&#039;ve referred to it as a hat just before this passage, I tend to feel that &#039;elegant variation&#039; is usually neither elegant nor necessary.

Also, I really don&#039;t think that lucency - &#039;emitting light&#039; - can be used in the same metaphorical sense as lucidity - &#039;allowing light to pass through&#039;.

Sorry - don&#039;t wish to seem unduly pedantic!

Another great ReCaptcha pair here:

&lt;b&gt;scrimps libras&lt;/b&gt;.

&lt;b&gt;scrimps libros&lt;/b&gt; might be even better!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skirting a bit close to &#8220;overwriting&#8221;, I think, John.  Probably deliberate &#8211; but might be straying a tad too far.  I can&#8217;t think of many circumstances in which &#8216;headgear&#8217; is an acceptable substitute for &#8216;hat&#8217;.  Even if you&#8217;ve referred to it as a hat just before this passage, I tend to feel that &#8216;elegant variation&#8217; is usually neither elegant nor necessary.</p>
<p>Also, I really don&#8217;t think that lucency &#8211; &#8216;emitting light&#8217; &#8211; can be used in the same metaphorical sense as lucidity &#8211; &#8216;allowing light to pass through&#8217;.</p>
<p>Sorry &#8211; don&#8217;t wish to seem unduly pedantic!</p>
<p>Another great ReCaptcha pair here:</p>
<p><b>scrimps libras</b>.</p>
<p><b>scrimps libros</b> might be even better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moonrat</title>
		<link>http://johnesimpson.com/blog/2009/04/brief-fable-for-our-time-maybe-from-the-wip/comment-page-1/#comment-5102</link>
		<dc:creator>Moonrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnesimpson.com/blog/?p=4158#comment-5102</guid>
		<description>can i just say that if i were a welsh brewmaster, that would definitely be my name?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can i just say that if i were a welsh brewmaster, that would definitely be my name?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

