The states of mind or feelings that art can excite have been helpfully distinguished in Sanskrit aesthetics, where they are called rasas, from a word meaning “juice” or “essence”. A fully achieved work of art should flow with all nine of them: their names might be transposed into English as wonder, joy, sexual pleasure, pity, anguish, anger, terror, disgust and laughter.
(Marina Warner, Monsters of Our Own Making [source])
Not from whiskey river:
Naming of Parts
To-day we have naming of parts. Yesterday,
We had daily cleaning. And to-morrow morning,
We shall have what to do after firing. But to-day,
To-day we have naming of parts. Japonica
Glistens like coral in all of the neighboring gardens,
And to-day we have naming of parts.This is the lower sling swivel. And this
Is the upper sling swivel, whose use you will see,
When you are given your slings. And this is the piling swivel,
Which in your case you have not got. The branches
Hold in the gardens their silent, eloquent gestures,
Which in our case we have not got.This is the safety-catch, which is always released
With an easy flick of the thumb. And please do not let me
See anyone using his finger. You can do it quite easy
If you have any strength in your thumb. The blossoms
Are fragile and motionless, never letting anyone see
Any of them using their finger.And this you can see is the bolt. The purpose of this
Is to open the breech, as you see. We can slide it
Rapidly backwards and forwards: we call this
Easing the spring. And rapidly backwards and forwards
The early bees are assaulting and fumbling the flowers:
They call it easing the Spring.They call it easing the Spring: it is perfectly easy
If you have any strength in your thumb: like the bolt,
And the breech, and the cocking-piece, and the point of balance,
Which in our case we have not got; and the almond-blossom
Silent in all of the gardens and the bees going backwards and
forwards,
For to-day we have naming of parts.
(Henry Reed, from Lessons of the War [source]; see an excellent film interpretation of the poem here.)
And…: Somehow I’d never come across this on my own. But thanks to Eudaemonia, I have now — Vonnegut’s rules for writing successful fiction:
Now lend me your ears. Here is Creative Writing 101:
- Use the time of total strangers in such a way he or she will not feel the time was wasted.
- Give the reader at least one character he or she can root for.
- Every character should want something, even if it is only a glass of water.
- Every sentence must do one of two things — reveal character or advance the action.
- Start as close to the end as possible.
- Be a sadist. No matter how sweet and innocent your leading characters, make awful things happen to them — in order that the reader may see what they are made of.
- Write to please just one person. If you open a window and make love to the world, so to speak, your story will get pneumonia.
- Give your reader as much information as possible as soon as possible. Readers should have such complete understanding of what is going on, where and why, that they could finish the story themselves, should cockroaches eat the last few pages.
And finally, we move on to this, per Wikipedia:
In bluegrass music, a break is a short instrumental solo played between sections of a song and is conventionally a variation on the song’s melody. A breakdown is an instrumental form that features a series of breaks, each played by a different instrument.
A notable example of the bluegrass breakdown has been summed up thusly (also from Wikipedia):
[Earl] Scruggs won a Grammy award in 2002 for the 2001 recording of “Foggy Mountain Breakdown,” which featured among others, actor and comedian Steve Martin on 2nd banjo, Albert Lee and Vince Gill on guitars, Marty Stuart on mandolin, and Paul Shaffer on piano.
As you can see below, the summation may leave something to be desired. This video of Scruggs & Co. performing “Foggy Mountain Breakdown” is from the David Letterman show, at around the time that Grammy came to roost:
froog says
I am now suffering the tantalising torture of being able to view but not hear YouTube videos. Aaaagh! Curse you, China net censors!
I love Lessons of War (and yes, I have posted all three parts on my blog – did you check? – but without such elaborate commentary and background detail as the remarkable Sole Arabian Tree). Naming of Parts is the most famous of the three pieces, but the other two are also well worth a look – especially the closing lines of Judging Distances.
Marina Warner on Sanskrit aesthetics is marvellous too; I may have to bring this to The Artist’s attention.
marta says
I’ve got that Vonnegut list somewhere. And I like Marina Warner too. I’ve got her book on the beast and the blonde.
I need to see if I’ve followed those rules…
Querulous Squirrel says
Love the Vonnegut rules. Love the Bluegrass. The rest still has to sink in.
Kate Lord Brown says
John you’re spoiling us ;) Love Warner. Hadn’t read the Vonnegut rules in a long time (now printed out where I can see them).
John says
froog: Seeing/Not hearing YouTube — that’s progress of a sort, isn’t it?
I didn’t check your blog for Lessons of War, although I did think, briefly, that I ought to. This is moving beyond the realm of coincidence; I feel like I’m walking across fresh snow, all proud of myself and excited by the scenery, only to be confronted whenever I pause by someone yelling into a megaphone, You’re walking in MY footsteps!
marta: I, too, thought of holding my stories — at least the current one — up to be measured against those 8 little bullet points. I fear the worst, though, so I’m procrastinating until I get to “The End.” Why put a pillow over its face until it gets to draw at least one breath? :)
Squirrel: I’m always curious to learn what others make of the (absence of?) connections among the bits and pieces of these Friday posts. Talk about trance state — that’s pretty much how these develop.
Kate: Rules about writing, even by writing superstars who (presumably) know what they’re talking about, can validate or mock our writing efforts irrespective of the writing’s true worth. I hope you haven’t taped these up in too prominent a spot!
froog says
Sorry about the megaphone, John!
I prefer a ‘parallel universe’ analogy – two different people leading the ‘same’ lives!
Or perhaps we’re reaching the same places via completely different routes: like that classic cartoon where a man in ragged clothes has crawled on his hands and knees for miles across a desert, and then crests a sand dune to discover the bleached skeleton of some poor wretch clad in similar rags and scraps who’d been coming in the opposite direction – his tracks in the sand stretching to the far horizon.
Yes, pretty bleak, I know – but even that’s better than being Scott discovering the Norwegian flag at the South Pole.