A few weeks ago I reviewed Mary Doria Russell’s The Sparrow at the Book Book review blog. I just posted a follow-up there, a review of The Sparrow‘s sequel, called Children of God. However, if you have not read The Sparrow, please don’t read my Children of God review: it assumes that you know what happened on the planet Rakhat.
Briefly, I found the later book much harder to like than the earlier (although I continued to appreciate Russell’s skill):
- We’re forced to spend much time in the company (and minds) of The Sparrow‘s less pleasant characters.
- Much of the fun of The Sparrow came from the kidding, affectionate, and sometimes flirtatious interaction among the humans who made the trip to Rakhat. That original cast of characters is almost completely absent from this book; in their place we have a much more serious bunch. (There are reasons why they’re so serious. That doesn’t magically transform them into a larky gang of back-slappers, however.)
As I mention at the end of the Book Book review, I’d probably rate Children of God something like 85 out of 100, vs. The Sparrow‘s 95. Still worth a read, though — if for no other reason, than that it completes the circle of Emilio Sandoz’s story, while redeeming some of its predecessor’s horror.
marta says
I know I posted over at Book Book, but I wanted to add here that my main reason for liking Children of God was to spend more time with Emilio.
John says
marta: If I could create a character a single percentage point as interesting, likable, sometimes unlikable, and generally complex as Emilio Sandoz, I think I could die a happy man. A great creation, he, and probably worth reading the two books for him alone — even for people who don’t generally take to SF/F or rumination.
(And thanks for recommending the books to me in the first place, btw.)