[Image: A-Maze-ing Laughter, by Yue Minjun. More info in the note at the foot of this post.]
From whiskey river:
If someone gave you a device with which you could see entire worlds just by holding it in front of your eyes, worlds of such beauty and complexity that they took your breath away, wouldn’t you want to show this device to everyone you knew?
(Ann Patchett [source])
…and:
Late August
This is the plum season, the nights
blue and distended, the moon
hazed, this is the season of peacheswith their lush lobed bulbs
that glow in the dusk, apples
that drop and rot
sweetly, their brown skins veined as glandsNo more the shrill voices
that cried Need Need
from the cold pond, bladed
and urgent as new grassNow it is the crickets
that say Ripe Ripe
slurred in the darkness, while the plumsdripping on the lawn outside
our window, burst
with a sound like thick syrup
muffled and slowThe air is still
warm, flesh moves over
flesh, there is nohurry
(Margaret Atwood [source])
…and:
A great many people don’t know how to laugh at all. A man can give himself away completely by his laughter, so that you suddenly learn all of his innermost secrets. Laughter calls first of all for sincerity, and where does one find sincerity? Sincere and unspiteful laughter is mirth. A man’s mirth is a feature that gives away the whole man, from head to foot. Someone’s character won’t be cracked for a long time, then the man bursts out laughing somehow quite sincerely, and his whole character suddenly opens up as if on the flat of your hand. Only a man of the loftiest and happiest development knows how to be mirthful infectiously, that is, irresistibly and goodheartedly. I’m not speaking of his mental development, but of his character, of the whole man. And so, if you want to discern a man and know his soul, you must look, not at how he keeps silent, or how he speaks, or how he weeps, or even how he is stirred by the noblest ideas, but you had better look at him when he laughs. If a man has a good laugh, it means he’s a good man.
(Fyodor Dostoyevsky [source (slightly different wording)]
Not from whiskey river:
We all need someone higher, wiser, older to tell us that we’re not crazy after all, that what we’re doing is all right. All right, hell, fine!
But it is easy to doubt yourself, because you look around at a community of notions by other writers, other intellectuals, and they make you blush with guilt. Writing is supposed to be difficult, agonizing, a dreadful exercise, a terrible occupation.
But, you see, my stories have led me through my life. They shout, I follow. They run up and bite me on the leg — I respond by writing down everything that goes on during the bite. When I finish, the idea lets go, and runs off.
That is the kind of life I’ve had. Drunk, and in charge of a bicycle, as an Irish police report once put it. Drunk with life, that is, and not knowing where off to next. But you’re on your way before dawn. And the trip? Exactly one half terror, exactly one half exhilaration.
(Ray Bradbury [source])
…and:
Trouble with Math in a One-Room Country School
The others bent their heads and started in.
Confused, I asked my neighbor
to explain — a sturdy, bright-cheeked girl
who brought raw milk to school from her family’s
herd of Holsteins. Ann had a blue bookmark,
and on it Christ revealed his beating heart,
holding the flesh back with His wounded hand.
Ann understood division…Miss Moran sprang from her monumental desk
and led me roughly through the class
without a word. My shame was radical
as she propelled me past the cloakroom
to the furnace closet, where only the boys
were put, only the older ones at that.
The door swung briskly shut.The warmth, the gloom, the smell
of sweeping compound clinging to the broom
soothed me. I found a bucket, turned it
upside down, and sat, hugging my knees.
I hummed a theme from Haydn that I knew
from my piano lessons…
and hardened my heart against authority.
And then I heard her steps, her fingers
on the latch. She led me, blinking
and changed, back to the class.
(Jane Kenyon [source])
…and:
[I am reminded of] the story of two Zen monks who were crossing a river. The ford was very deep because of a flood, and there was a girl who was trying to get across. One of the monks picked her up, threw her over his shoulder, carried her across and put her down on the other side. Then the monks went on their way and the girl went another. Along the way, the other monk had been in a kind of embarrassed silence which he finally broke to say:“Do you realize that you broke a monastic rule by touching and picking up a woman like that?”
And the first monk said:
“Oh, but I left her on the other side of the river and you are still carrying her.”
(Alan Watts [source])
___________________________
About the image: Chinese artist Yue Minjun specializes in works which include stylized views of his own face, broadly laughing. The sculpture shown here, A-Mazing-ing Laughter, is on exhibit in Vancouver. It was first acquired temporarily, as part of the city’s 2009-2011 Biennale celebration; apparently it was such a hit (albeit a controversial one) that the city — with the help of some generous donors, and Yue Minjun himself — has since installed it permanently, in Morton Park. The figures are about eight-and-a-half feet tall.
Jayne says
Quickly- I meant to comment on this last week. The image is heartwarming, makes me smile! I had a Jane Kenyon moment once. Truly, cloakroom and all! Only it was not Ms. Moran. It was Mother David. These are moments once does not forget. One never never leaves a cloakroom unaltered!
I can just hear Ray Bradbury speaking/cheering those words. ;)
John says
And how would your Mother David have felt about your inability to identify St. Vincent??? Exactly: Back into the cloakroom with YOU, young lady!
That sculpture in the photo apparently has been the source of some disgruntlement among the Vancouver citizenry. While many people like it, others find it creepy, or ugly, or a waste of public monies, or, or, or… I don’t know. Maybe it’s just me. But it feels that there’s a certain irony in frowning-sneering-shuddering responses to a hymn to laughter.
Richard says
https://twitter.com/RMTywg/status/973740275158999040
I love the opening image! Is it yours? I hope it is okay, but I have used it to complement one of my #MicroPoetry Verses. If you have concerns – please let me know, as I do not want to misuse the image.
with respect,
Richard
John says
Hello, Richard — thanks for stopping by.
The photo is not by me, no, but I don’t remember where I found it. (Apparently, I was more casual about photo attribution in 2012 than I am now.) It was probably on Flickr, where I find most (but not all) images I use here, and from there I get only ones licensed for Creative Commons reuse. For what it’s worth, though, I just did a Google Images search for it, which turned up many, many similar (if not identical) ones. Since the sculpture depicted is exhibited in a public place, simple straightforward photos of it — applying no “arty” angles or anything — are probably not going to be copyrighted.
Funnily enough, The Missus and I have been watching the most recent season of The X-Files, on Hulu — and the episode we watched last night included a scene which took place among the figures in the sculpture. (The show is shot in Vancouver, where the park is located.)
Thanks again for stopping in, and for asking about the photo!