From whiskey river:
The range of what we think and do
is limited by what we fail to notice.
And because we fail to notice
that we fail to notice
there is little we can do
to change
until we notice
how failing to notice
shapes our thoughts and deeds
(Daniel Goleman, quoting R.D. Laing [source])
…and:
You know, all mystics — Catholic, Christian, non-Christian, no matter what their theology, no matter what their religion — are unanimous on one thing: that all is well, all is well. Though everything is a mess, all is well. Strange paradox, to be sure. But, tragically, most people never get to see that all is well because they are asleep. They are having a nightmare.
(Anthony de Mello [source])
Not from whiskey river:
The Director continued his demonstration with electric lights today.
“Up to now,” he said, “we have been dealing with objects in the form of points of light. Now I am going to show you a circle of attention. It will consist of a whole section, large or small in dimension, and will include a series of independent points of objects. The eye may pass from one to another of these points, but it must not go beyond the indicated limit of the circle of attention.”
First there was complete darkness. A moment later a large lamp was lighted on the table near which I was seated. The shade of the lamp threw the circle of rays down on my head and hands, and made a bright light on the centre of the table, where there was a number of small things. These shone and reflected all sorts of different colours. The rest of the stage and the hall were swallowed up in darkness.
“The lighted space on the table,” said the Director, “illustrates a Small Circle of Attention. You yourself, or rather your head and hands, on which the light falls, are the centre of the circle.”
The effect on me was like magic. All the little knick-knacks on the table drew my attention without any forcing or any instruction on my part. In a circle of light, in the midst of darkness, you have the sensation of being entirely alone. I felt even more at home in this circle of light than in my own room.
(Konstantin Stanislavski, An Actor Prepares [source])
…and:
Notice What This Poem Is Not Doing
The light along the hills in the morning
comes down slowly, naming the trees
white, then coasting the ground for stones to nominate.Notice what this poem is not doing.
A house, a house, a barn, the old
quarry, where the river shrugs–
how much of this place is yours?Notice what this poem is not doing.
Every person gone has taken a stone
to hold, and catch the sun. The carving
says, “Not here, but called away.”Notice what this poem is not doing.
The sun, the earth, the sky, all wait.
The crowns and redbirds talk. The light
along the hills has come, has found you.Notice what this poem has not done.
(William Stafford)
In 1950, singer Patti Page had a huge hit with a song called “Tennessee Waltz.” How huge? According to Wikipedia’s article on Patti Page, this was “the last song to sell one million copies of sheet music.” It’s also one of the few songs covered by Leonard Cohen, who couldn’t resist adding lyrics of his own. (You can listen to it — a “wonderfully croaky dirge,” as Rolling Stone has said — behind this YouTube video.) Finally, “Tennessee Waltz” is (at least as far as I know, i.e., not very far) the only song which is about itself. Something to think about, hmm?
Rather than Patti Page’s version, I’ll post here a sweet instrumental-only interpretation, from an album called Smoky Mountain Hits (1990). The performers are a group of talented Nashville sidemen — in alphabetical order:
- Larry Beaird (acoustic guitar, string bass, dobro)
- Craig Duncan (fiddle, hammered dulcimer)
- David Schnaufer (mountain dulcimer, jaw harp)
- Eric Silver (mandolin, banjo)
- Gene Wooten (dobro, auto harp, banjo)
I doubt that all those instruments are at work in this particular selection; that’s just how the artists are credited on the album itself. Lyrics to the Patti Page version appear, as usual, below the little audio-player thingum.
[Below, click Play button to begin Tennessee Waltz. While audio is playing, volume control appears at left — a row of little vertical bars. This clip is 3:04 long.]
Lyrics:
Tennessee Waltz
(by Redd Stewart and Pee Wee King;
lyrics as sung by Patti Page)I was dancin’ with my darlin’
To the Tennessee Waltz
When an old friend I happened to see
I introduced her to my loved one
And while they were dancin’
My friend stole my sweetheart from meI remember the night and the Tennessee Waltz
Now I know just how much I have lost
Yes, I lost my little darlin’
The night they were playing
The beautiful Tennessee Waltz
Nance says
Read this post after the one on switchology, dated 2/26, so now I’m referencing forward, historically speaking: Goleman quoting Laing…now THERE’s knots for you!
Checking out the source, I find that it’s a book that I’ve read and kept, Vital Lies; Simple Truths. And this sentence jumped out at me…two favorite words to abuse, one of them almost new:
“He used the word ‘dormitive’ to denote an obfuscation, a failure to see things as they are.”
All this time, I’d thought I was shooting for the perfect degree of denial, and all I really needed to do in order to obfuscate optimally was dial up my dormitage.
John says
Nance: I was sort of thrilled when I saw that that opening selection came from Knots. For some reason — probably a book review — I bought that in hardback when it came out. (And, ye gods — if I could only find my copy now, from that Amazon page it looks like I could sell it for $150 these days…) I have no idea what the psychological profession thinks of it, or used to, but I fell immediately under the sway of its peculiar rhythms of knotted thought.
Yes, denial doesn’t come in perfect degrees, but in an infinite number of settings between degrees. I’m not 100% sure that’s one of the things you’re saying, but so it seems to me.
And I sometimes wonder if these Friday posts aren’t a tad dormitive.
Froog says
According to Wikipedia, The Tennessee Waltz is also big in Japan; in fact, the biggest selling song ever there (although it says “as of 1974”, which confuses me somewhat: do they mean “since 1974”, or “in 1974, but perhaps not any more, because it’s just too hard to check the data for the last 37 years”??).
I love this version. It feels as if it draws on a much older roots music tradition. It reminds me a lot of the songs on the soundtrack to Ken Burns’ series about the Civil War. It also reminds me a lot of one of Ry Cooder’s more unusual forays into musicology, his 1978 album Jazz (one of my favourite serendipitous ‘bargain bin’ discoveries when I was at college) – which is not really ‘jazz’ at all, but ‘pre-jazz’: recreations of hymns, vaudeville tunes, and ragtime numbers from around 1900, some of the earliest ever recorded music appearing on piano-rolls and cylinders.
I feel sure that Tennessee Waltz can’t be the ONLY song whose subject is a song of the same name, but…. I’m thus far failing to come up with another. This could keep me awake for the next few nights!
John says
Froog: I completely missed that Wikipedia tidbit — especially the “as of 1974” qualifier. You’re right: huh?!?
…but I did notice that that factoid was linked to a footnote, which in turn was linked to a Google Books page (you may not have access to Google Books from behind the Great Firewall). It’s in an issue of Billboard, in December of (yes!) 1974: an article headlined “Country to Pop,” about crossover hits…
Gotta love that little haughtily-sniffing of course, hmm?
I couldn’t find any source for Billboard’s claim, although it seems to be repeated on any number of other sites and pages. I wondered about the effect of post-WW2 record purchases by US servicemen in Japan — maybe that had something to do with it? The Wikipedia article on J-pop, though, mentions that a 1952 Japanese cover of “Tennessee Waltz” (by a singer named Chiemi Eri) was “also popular.”
I have a feeling that my “songs which are about themselves” claim falls into a category something like what Vonnegut called (in speaking of people) a “granfalloon”: a sort of bogus classification with no real-world practical application. :)