Choosing Our Favorite Blind Spots (and Putting Ourselves There)

by Leave a Comment

Black-and-white photograph of five municipal gardeners at an unknown location (possibly in Europe), all bent at the waist as they weed a small garden plot on a traffic island; they resemble ostriches with -- yes -- their heads in the sand!

[Image: “ostriches,” by DeviantArt user “mudri.” (Used here under a Creative Commons license; thank you!) Found it via inspiration from the source of the Alan Fletcher quote, below.]

From whiskey river’s commonplace book (with small differences in translation):

I am not I

I am not I.
I am this one
walking beside me whom I do not see,
whom at times I manage to visit,
and whom at other times I forget;
who remains calm and silent while I talk,
who forgives, gently, when I hate,
who walks where I am not,
who will remain standing when I die.

(Juan Ramon Jimenez [source])

…and:

I have said that my problem is I am too old, too burdened by experience. But that is a lie. In reality, I am too young, chronically a naive child of wonder with a primitive lack of understanding; I am blind, helpless, forever newborn. I look at the world with wide, uncomprehending eyes, neither trying to classify its contents intellectually, nor trying to achieve technical mastery for some practical purpose. I feel a sympathy for all that is, without understanding my own place in the time and space in which I live. I have the savage’s dread of unseen foes. And like the primitive who stands for the first time before a giant Sequoia or at the oceans edge, I am again and again filled with awe by experiences of a world which my mind cannot encompass.

(Sheldon Kopp [source])

…and:

Ask Me

Some time when the river is ice ask me
mistakes I have made. Ask me whether
what I have done is my life. Others
have come in their slow way into
my thought, and some have tried to help
or to hurt – ask me what difference
their strongest love or hate has made.

I will listen to what you say.
You and I can turn and look
at the silent river and wait. We know
the current is there, hidden; and there
are comings and goings from miles away
that hold the stillness exactly before us.
What the river says, that is what I say.

(William Stafford [source])

…and:

Then there is the BIG PROBLEM — who are you? There is an endemic human tendency for self-deception. We all think we’re one kind of person when we’re somewhat different (especially viewed by others) than we imagine we are. You — the reader — no doubt feel you’re an exception.

(Alan Fletcher [source])

From elsewhere:

Wooden statue of Gaspare Tagliacozzi at the University of Bologna[16th-century surgeon Gaspare] Tagliacozzi achieved early acclaim as a professor of anatomy at the University of Bologna and wrote a famous medical text on grafting [i.e., replacing body parts], but his legacy has more or less been reduced to noses. To this day a statue of Tagliacozzi stands in a wall niche at the university’s anatomy lecture hall. One foot and an arm extend outside the niche, creating the impression that the man is coming toward us with excitement, to show us what he holds in his hand. It’s a nose, presumably from a cadaver. Painting of Gaspare Tagliacozzi as a young manOne of two existing oil portraits of Tagliacozzi shows the scholar as a young man seated at a wooden desk, one hand resting on an open book, the other holding a nose between thumb and index finger. Tagliacozzi holds the item with the nostrils facing the viewer, as if to say, Yes, yes, it is, it’s a nose. Light illuminates what the painter wishes us to focus on: the surgeon’s face and hands, his book, the nose. It wasn’t until much later that I noticed the severed head, scalp flayed and brain on view, sitting in the gloom on the far side [i.e., bottom right] of the desk. It was as though Tagliacozzi had insisted on including it, but the painter was like, This is too much, Gaspare. I’m kind of in love with Gaspare Tagliacozzi.

(Mary Roach [source])

…and:

Schopenhauer was a philosopher who was focused on the motivations of the individual. He concluded that they aren’t too pretty: humans are motivated by their will and not by their intellect, though they may firmly deny it. In his 1818 publication, The World as Will and Representation, he came to the conclusion that “man can indeed do what he wants, but he cannot will what he wants.” …Schopenhauer made this clear when describing the will as blind and strong and the intellect as sighted but lame: “The most striking figure for the relation of the two is that of the strong blind man carrying the sighted lame man on his shoulders.”

(Michael S. Gazzaniga [source])

…and:

Stacking Cistern My Bones on Top of Your Bones on Top of Your Bones

Not an optimist. I lie awake at night and say the name
of everyone on the block and for three blocks over
and then the names of the people I don’t know. I call
them by their house number, by their street address.
I wish they not be sick. I wish they not get shot. I wish.
It calms me but also is it selfish? Do I do it to keep
myself alive? I have a theory that if I let the light
out into the world then we’ll all get to stay alive. Want
to stay alive. I think of everything I know about all
the people on my block. I list Ms. Edna and her children.
I say the names of everyone at the church and then
the people I don’t know. I want everyone to have money.
I want everyone to have a house and food and be
believed in and be told they’re believed in. I want
to know these things can happen so I don’t want to die.
Or so I can feel the hollow part of me filling with all
of us getting to be filled up. There’s no part of me that’s
a saint. I’m not saying this to get some extra credit.
I’m saying I wonder if you do it too? My bones on top
of your bones on top of your bones. Or your bones
on top of mine. All of us awake at 3 am wishing the best
for people like filling up an endless cistern with light
and understanding. All the way down to the center of
the earth and up to where the solitary planes fly past.

(Gabrielle Calvocoressi [source])

Share

Embrace the Day’s Sublime

by 3 Comments

[Image: “Autumn, Sliced and Diced,” by John E. Simpson. (Photo shared here under a Creative Commons License; for more information, see this page at RAMH.)]

From whiskey river’s commonplace book:

When you consider something like death, after which (there being no news flash to the contrary) we may well go out like a candle flame, then it probably doesn’t matter if we try too hard, are awkward sometimes, care for one another too deeply, are excessively curious about nature, are too open to experience, enjoy a nonstop expense of the senses in an effort to know life intimately and lovingly. It probably doesn’t matter if, while trying to be modest and eager watchers of life’s many spectacles, we sometimes look clumsy or get dirty or ask stupid questions or reveal our ignorance or say the wrong thing or light up with wonder like the children we all are. It probably doesn’t matter if a neighbor, fetching her mail, sees us standing in the cold with our own letters in one hand and a seismically red autumn leaf in the other, its color hitting our senses like a blow from a stun gun, as we stand with a huge grin, too paralyzed by the intricately veined gaudiness of the leaf to move.

(Diane Ackerman [source])

…and:

Landscape Mode

Overlooking the Cumberland River,
Clarksville, Tennessee,
Early November 1996

In ancient Chinese paintings we see more sky than
earth, so when clouds hurry by in silver-gray
inkbursts of rolling readiness right along the river,

ripe with rain, rushing the road of time along,
pushing back light, belittling the black and white clarity
of Hollywood in its prime, the eye climbs down to greet

with shining gusto trees along the shore, Orpyland
beyond the frame, the blue horizon hidden in a sea
of possibilities. And beyond this there’s jazz: Jimmy Giuffre’s

Train on the River stretched out strong like a pet cat
and that’s that. But not quite. This poem paints
poorly what sketchers and colorists do best. The rest

should come out empty, allowing you to fill in your own
basic emptiness, your openness, your self-portrait
forged and cataloged; on quiet exhibit, on temporary loan.

Descended from clouds immensely more ancient than China,
you never quit becoming the background, the field in a sky
whose subtle earthiness sails over our heads altogether.

(Al Young [source])

…and:

Every Day

Three men spoke to me today.

One, bereaved, told me his grief, saying
Had God abandoned him, or was there
no God to abandon him?

One, condemned, told me his epitaph,
‘Groomed to die.’ On Death Row he remembers
the underside of his gradeschool desk, air-raid drill.
He never expected to live
even this long.
He sticks his head back down between his knees,
‘not even sad.’

One, a young father, told me
how he had needed his child, even
before she was conceived.
How he had planted a garden too big to hoe.
He told me about the small leaves near his window,
how he had seen in them their desire to be,
to be the world.

With this one I sat laughing,
eating, drinking wine. ‘The same word,’
he said, ‘she has the same word for me and the dog!
She loves us!’
Every day, every day I hear
enough to fill
a year of nights with wondering.

(Denise Levertov [source])

From elsewhere:

When you were young—unfathomably, microscopically young, an embryo of five, six, maybe eight days past conception—you were a blob of pluripotent stem cells: uniform cells bound for a multitude of bodily fates. You were an entity made of potential. To use the analogy of Mr. Potato Head, you were all potato. Or plastic maybe. You get what I’m after. To stick to our flawed analogy, you can think of your DNA as the kid with the vision for the Potato Head she’s about to build. Under its sway, your pluripotent stem cells began to differentiate. Some became blood cells, some bone, some neuron; humans have four hundred, even five hundred, cell types in all. The cells grew and multiplied and assembled themselves and soon there were recognizable pieces—eyes, teeth, mustache, hat: all the bits that together produced the delightful, one-of-a kind Potato Head you are today.

(Mary Roach [source])

…and:

Animal of the Earth

For the first time I understand
I’m an animal too.
Bones.
Warm breath.
Moving shaggy arms
To encircle another.
Looked at
By beasts
That fly
Walk with four feet down
Crawl
On tiny scales that shine with flecks of spring.
I’m
The only animal
That wants to write a book
That moves so uncertainly through the cold
That spends so much time
Gazing at the sky And listening for itself
Among the rustling sounds.

(Tom Hennen [source])

…and (on her childhood alertness to wonderful words):

By the time I’d learned sublime, I’d already seen its chased grays and lit hurricane greens in the Hudson River School painters’ skies (firmament!), those parlous heights brightening to revelatory, those gorges blackly, mossily seducing. I’d already read Keats’ “The Eve of St. Agnes,” and to that, too—though I apologize now for the taxonomy of purples I made of it in high school English class—I retroactively applied the word.

My Aunt Pasq made us Easter bread—dense, yeasty and saltless with a hard-boiled egg, shell and all, held fast in its braided center. My grandmother grew tomatoes in her backyard. I had, for “sublime,” the words bread and tomato. I had the phrase “go pick a nice tomato for dinner.” And once out there, alone with my task, I had all to myself the teetering six o’clock light, the peeling and tender, pink-skinned birch shadowing the grass and me, the fence hung with flower boxes we’d watered just that morning, the fence keeping back the weedy graveyard on one side of the house and grocery’s parking lot on the other. That is, sublime was all around—loose, though, and rampant, unaffiliated with the word for it. Even now I say it sotto voce, preferring egg, bread, tomato, birch, wet fence.

(Lia Purpura [source])

Aside to friends in the US:

If you’ll be attending a No Kings rally on Saturday, please be careful. Read up in advance about any precautions the event organizers have prepared for you. Say and sing everything that needs to be heard — say and sing it loudly and proudly. Know that as many millions of you as there are out there, many, many more millions of your sisters and brothers can’t be with you, for one reason or another. (Among them: the souls of millions of Americans who’ve died over the last 250 years, never in their worst nightmares imagining the America we’ve got today.) There is sublime, and there is sublime. Embrace it in whatever form you find it tomorrow — not the least, in one another.

Share

To Whom Does the Gift Belong?

by Leave a Comment

[Image: “Blink and Go Hungry (L&M Donuts, June 2025),” by John E. Simpson. (Photo shared here under a Creative Commons License; for more information, see this page at RAMH.)]

From whiskey river’s commonplace book:

There once lived a great warrior. Though quite old, he still was able to defeat any challenger. His reputation extended far and wide throughout the land and many students gathered to study under him.

One day an infamous young warrior arrived at the village, determined to be the first man to defeat the great master. Along with his strength, he had an uncanny ability to spot and exploit any weakness in an opponent. He would wait for his opponent to make the first move, thus revealing a weakness, and then would strike with merciless force and lightning speed.

Much against the advice of his concerned students, the old master gladly accepted the young warrior’s challenge. As the two squared off for battle, the young warrior began to hurl insults at the old master. He threw dirt and spit in his face. For hours he verbally assaulted him with every curse and insult known to man. But the old warrior merely stood there calmly. Finally, the young warrior exhausted himself. Knowing he was defeated, he left feeling ashamed.

Somewhat disappointed that he did not fight the insolent youth, the students gathered around the old master and questioned him. “How could you endure such indignity? How did you drive him away?”

“If someone comes to give you a gift and you do not receive it,” the master replied, “to whom does the gift belong?”

([source: various, including this])

…and:

everything

I went out on the porch. Nothing. Silence. Vast silence of the woods full of fireflies. The stars. Down in the south the huge sign of the Scorpion. The red eye of Regulus. Just stars. Not a light from any house or farm. Only fireflies and stars and silence. A car racing by the road, then more silence. Nothing. Nothing.

When a car goes by you can feel the alien frenzy of it. Someone madly going somewhere for no reason. I am a complete prisoner under these stars. With nothing. Or perhaps with everything.

I sit on the porch and deliberately refuse to rationalize anything, to explain anything or to comment on anything, only on what is there. I am there. Fireflies, stars, darkness, the massive shadows of the woods, the vague dark valley. And nothing, nothing, nothing.

Is she thinking of me? Loving me? Is her heart calling to mine in the dark? I don’t know. I can’t honestly say that I know. I can’t honestly say I know anything except that it is late, that I can’t sleep, that there are fireflies all over the place, and that there is not the remotest possibility of making any poetic statement on this. You don’t write poems about nothing.

And yet somehow this nothing seems to be everything. I look at the south sky, and for some ungodly reason, for which there is no reason, everything is complete. I think of going back to bed in peace without knowing why, a peace that cannot be justified by anything, by any reason, any proof, any argument, by any supposition. There are no suppositions left. Only fireflies.

…I want to tell you something, but I don’t know how to begin to say it. I am afraid that if I start talking and writing, I will confuse everything. Nothing needs to be said.

(Thomas Merton [source])

From elsewhere:

Toward the Verrazano

Up from South Jersey and the low persistent
pines, pollution curls into the sky
like dark cast-off ribbons
and the part of us that’s pure camera,
that loves funnel clouds and blood
on a white dress, is satisfied.
At mile 127, no trace of a tree now,
nothing but concrete and high tension
wires, we hood toward to Outerbridge
past Arthur Kill Road where garbage trucks
work the largest landfill in the world.
The windscreens are littered, gorgeous
with rotogravure sections, torn love
letters mauve once-used tissues. The gulls
dip down like addicts, rise like angels.
Soon we’re in traffic, row houses, a college
we’ve never heard of stark as an asylum.
In the distance there it is, the crown
of this back way in, immense, silvery,
and in no time we’re suspended
out over the Narrows by a logic linked
to faith, so accustomed to the miraculous
we hardly speak, and when we do
it’s with those words found on picture postcards
from polite friends with nothing to say.

(Stephen Dunn [source])

…and:

Regardless of the actual nature of time, we know that our conscious experience doesn’t represent the sequence of events in the world accurately. We have seen that through different processes the brain binds information that arrives at our sense receptors at different times and delivers it to us as a neat, present-moment package. But we can still wonder how conscious experience itself relates to time. Paying close attention to one’s moment-to-moment experience through a concentration exercise like meditation—or simply contemplating the mystery of one’s felt experience in general—leads to many interesting questions pertaining to time: How much time does a moment of consciousness take? Is consciousness continuous or does it somehow flicker in and out (and how would we know the difference)? What is the present moment; is it some sort of illusion? Is time itself an illusion?

(Annaka Harris [source])

…and:

Insomnia

After counting all the sheep in the world
I enumerate the wildebeests, snails,
camels, skylarks, etc.,

then I add up all the zoos and aquariums,
country by country.

By early light I am asleep
in a nightmare about drowning in the Flood,
yelling across the rising water
at preoccupied Noah as his wondrous
ark sails by and begins to grow smaller.

Now a silhouette on the horizon,
the only boat on earth is disappearing.

As I rise and fall on the rocking waves,
I concentrate on the giraffe couple,
their necks craning over the roof,
to keep my life from flashing before me.

After all the animals wink out of sight
I float on my back, eyes closed.
I picture all the fish in creation
leaping a fence in a field of water,
one colorful species after another.

(Billy Collins [source])

Share

Your Words Shape the World You Need

by Leave a Comment

[Image: a portion of a page from a story (anthology? novella? novel?) I never finished — but often think about — called “Barking Tree.” At one level, it’s a story about kids; on another level, though, it’s a story about, well, about the title of this post.]

From whiskey river’s commonplace book:

 …you are all original and talented and need to let it out of yourselves; that is to say, you have the creative impulse.

But the ardor for it is inhibited and dried up by many things; as I said, by criticism, self-doubt, duty, nervous fear which expresses itself in merely external action like running up and downstairs and scratching items off lists and thinking you are being efficient; by anxiety about making a living, by fear of not excelling.

Now this creative power I think is the Holy Ghost. My theology may not be very accurate but that is how I think of it. I know that William Blake called this creative power the Imagination and he said it was God. He, if anyone, ought to know, for he was one of the greatest poets and artists that ever lived.

Now Blake thought that this creative power should be kept alive in all people for all their lives. And so do I. Why? Because it is life itself. It is the Spirit. In fact it is the only important thing about us. The rest of us is legs and stomach, materialistic cravings and fears.

How could we keep it alive? By using it, by letting it out, by giving some time to it…

We have come to think that duty should come first. I disagree. Duty should be a by-product. Writing, the creative effort, the use of imagination, should come first—at least for some part of every day of your life. It is a wonderful blessing if you will use it. You will become happier, more enlightened, alive, impassioned, light-hearted and generous to everybody else. Even your health will improve. Colds will disappear and all the other ailments of discouragement and boredom…

Now, you see, I have established a reason for your working at writing, not in a trifling, weak way, but with affection and endurance. In other words, I want to make you feel that there is a great intrinsic reward to writing. Unless you feel that you will soon give it up. You won’t last very long at it. A few rejection slips will flatten you out. A few years of not making a cent out of it will make you give it up and feel bitterly that it was a waste of time.

I want to assure you with all earnestness, that no writing is a waste of time—no creative work where the feelings, the imagination, the intelligence must work. With every sentence you write, you have learned something. It has done you good. It has stretched your understanding. I know that.

(Brenda Ueland [source])

From elsewhere:

Writing

But prayer was not enough, after all, for my father.
His last two brothers died five weeks apart.
He couldn’t get to sleep, had no appetite, sat
staring. Though he prayed,
he could find no peace until he tried
to write about his brothers, tell a story
for each one: Perry’s long travail
with the steamfitters’ union, which he worked for;
and Harvey—here the handwriting changes,
he bears down—Harvey loved his children.

I discovered those few sheets of paper
as I looked through my father’s old Bible
on the morning of his funeral. The others
in the family had seen them long ago;
they had all known the story,
and they told me I had not, most probably, because
I am a writer,
and my father was embarrassed by his effort. Yet
who has seen him as I can: risen

in the middle of the night, bending over
the paper, working close
to the heart of all greatness, he is so lost.

(Judson Mitcham [source])

…and:

The [Pittsburgh] Pirates were in the cellar again. They lived in the cellar, like trolls. They hadn’t won a pennant since 1927. Nobody could even remember when they won ball games, the bums. They had some hitters, but no pitchers.

On the yellow back wall of our Richland Lane garage, I drew a target in red crayon. The target was a batter’s strike zone. The old garage was dark inside; I turned on the bare bulb. Then I walked that famously lonely walk out to the mound, our graveled driveway, and pitched.

I squinted at the strike zone, ignoring the jeers of the batter—oddly, Ralph Kiner. I received no impressions save those inside the long aerial corridor that led to the target. I threw a red-and-blue rubber ball, one of those with a central yellow band. I wound up; I drew back. The target held my eyes. The target set me spinning as the sun from a distance winds the helpless spheres. Entranced and drawn, I swung through the moves and woke up with the ball gone. It felt as if I’d gathered my own body, pointed it carefully, and thrown it down a tunnel bored by my eyes.

I pitched in a blind fever of concentration. I pitched, as I did most things, in order to concentrate. Why do elephants drink? To forget. I loved living at my own edge, as an explorer on a ship presses to the ocean’s rim; mind and skin were one joined force curved out and alert, prow and telescope. I pitched, as I did most things, in a rapture.

Now here’s the pitch. I followed the ball as if it had been my own head, and watched it hit the painted plastered wall. High and outside; ball one. While I stood still stupefied by the effort of the pitch, while I stood agog, unbreathing, mystical, and unaware, here came the daggone rubber ball again, bouncing out of the garage. And I had to hustle up some snappy fielding, or lose the ball in a downhill thicket next door.

The red, blue, and yellow ball came spinning out to the driveway, and sprang awry on the gravel; if I nabbed it, it was apt to bounce out of my mitt. Sometimes I threw the fielded grounder to first—sidearm—back to the crayon target, which had become the first baseman. Fine, but the moronic first baseman spat it back out again at once, out of the dark garage and bouncing crazed on the gravel; I bolted after it, panting. The pace of this game was always out of control.

(Annie Dillard [source])

Share

Stumbling Over the Life You’re Looking For

by Leave a Comment

[Image: “Ann and Morris Foster (c. 1951; photo by Jack).” These are my maternal grandparents; Morris would’ve turned 116 years old a few days ago, although he was only in his early 40s when this was taken. Ann was a year-and-a-half older.]

From whiskey river’s commonplace book:

On Living
(excerpt)

Let’s say you’re seriously ill, need surgery—
which is to say we might not get up
from the white table.
Even though it’s impossible not to feel sad
about going a little too soon,
we’ll still laugh at the jokes being told,
we’ll look out the window to see it’s raining,
or still wait anxiously
for the latest newscast…
Let’s say we’re at the front—
for something worth fighting for, say.
There, in the first offensive, on that very day,
we might fall on our face, dead.
We’ll know this with a curious anger,
but we’ll still worry ourselves to death
about the outcome of the war, which could last years.
Let’s say we’re in prison
and close to fifty,
and we have eighteen more years, say,
before the iron doors will open.
We’ll still live with the outside,
with its people and animals, struggle and wind—
I mean with the outside beyond the walls.
I mean, however and wherever we are,
we must live as if we will never die.

(Nazim Hikmet [source])

…and:

To have a good day is more than I expect, sometimes.
But I did enjoy the one that started with my child asking,
while looking at the calendar, “Is today an odd or evil day?”

([source: no other found])

…and:

The old monk sat by the side of the road. With his eyes closed, his legs crossed and his hands folded in his lap, he sat. In deep meditation, he sat.

Suddenly his zazen was interrupted by the harsh and demanding voice of a samurai warrior. “Old man! Teach me about heaven and hell!”

At first, as though he had not heard, there was no perceptible response from the monk. But gradually he began to open his eyes, the faintest hint of a smile playing around the corners of his mouth as the samurai stood there, waiting impatiently, growing more and more agitated with each passing second.

“You wish to know the secrets of heaven and hell?” replied the monk at last. “You who are so unkempt. You whose hands and feet are covered with dirt. You whose hair is uncombed, whose breath is foul, whose sword is all rusty and neglected. You who are ugly and whose mother dresses you funny. You would ask me of heaven and hell?”

The samurai uttered a vile curse. He drew his sword and raised it high above his head. His face turned to crimson and the veins on his neck stood out in bold relief as he prepared to sever the monk’s head from its shoulders.

“That is hell,” said the old monk gently, just as the sword began its descent.

In that fraction of a second, the samurai was overcome with amazement, awe, compassion and love for this gentle being who had dared to risk his very life to give him such a teaching. He stopped his sword in mid-flight and his eyes filled with grateful tears.

“And that,” said the monk, “is heaven.”

(John W. Groff, Jr. [source: quoted in numerous sources, including here])

From elsewhere:

Napoleon and the Furrier

During Napoleon’s invasion of Russia, his troops were battling in the middle of yet another small town in that endless wintry land, when he was accidentally separated from his men. A group of Russian Cossacks spotted him, and began chasing him through the twisting streets. Napoleon ran for his life, and ducked into a little furrier’s shop on a side alley. As Napoleon entered the shop, gasping for breath, he saw the furrier and cried piteously, “Save me, save me! Where can I hide?” The furrier said “Quick, under this big pile of furs in the corner,” and covered Napoleon up with many furs.

No sooner had he finished when the Russian Cossacks burst in the door, shouting “Where is he? We saw him come in.” Despite the furrier’s protests, they tore his shop apart trying to find Napoleon. They poked into the pile of furs with their swords, but didn’t find him. Soon they gave up and left.

After some time, Napoleon crept out from under the furs, unharmed, just as Napoleon’s personal guards came in the door. The furrier turned to Napoleon and said timidly, “Excuse me for asking this question of such a great man, but what was it like to be under those furs, knowing that the next moment would surely be your last?” Napoleon drew himself up to his full height, and said to the furrier indignantly, “How could you ask such a question of me, the emperor Napoleon!! Guards, take this impudent man out, blindfold him, and execute him. I, myself, will personally give the command to fire!”

The guards grabbed the poor furrier, dragged him outside, stood him up against a wall, and blindfolded him. The furrier could see nothing, but he could hear the movements of the guards as they slowly shuffled into a line and prepared their rifles. He could hear the soft ruffling sound of his clothing in the cold wind, and he felt it tugging gently at his clothes and chilling his cheeks, and the uncontrollable trembling in his legs. Then he heard Napoleon clear his throat and call out slowly, “Ready,…aim….” In that moment, knowing that even these few sensations were about to be taken from him forever, a feeling that he couldn’t describe welled up in him, and tears poured down his cheeks.

After a long period of silence, the furrier heard footsteps approaching him, and the blindfold was stripped from his eyes. Still partially blinded by the sudden sunlight, he saw Napoleon’s eyes looking deeply and intently into his own–eyes that seemed to see into every dusty corner of his being. Then Napoleon said softly, “Now you know.”

(Steve Andreas [source])

Share

It’s Already Happened: Welcome to the Other Side!

by Leave a Comment

[Video: “Turn Around,” a TV commercial from sometime in the 1960s promoting Kodak film and cameras. The singer, apparently: either Harry Belafonte — who’s also credited as a possible co-songwriter, with Malvina Reynolds and Alan Greene — or Ed Ames; I’m sure somebody knows the truth (see, e.g., this book)!]

From whiskey river’s commonplace book:

One day a young Buddhist, on his journey home, came to the banks of a wide river. Staring hopelessly at the great obstacle in front of him, he pondered for hours on just how to cross such a wide barrier. Just as he was about to give up his pursuit to continue his journey he saw a great teacher on the other side of the river. The young Buddhist yells over to the teacher, “Oh wise one, can you tell me how to get to the other side of this river?” The teacher ponders for a moment, looks up and down the river, and yells back, “My son, you are on the other side.”

([source: here, among many others])

…and:

The Options

When you die
here are the options:
everything or oblivion

A centre of light and around it
all you love, those dead
and those abiding still
and each holding
an object of endearment
you lost long ago
before you came to
know and be simultaneously
at last
at rest
beyond words

Or else your cells
stop their chemical
talk, the neurons say no
and their warmth leaves you
not even the absence of black—
nothing of earth’s up, round, biomass span
just the nonexistence
you tried to conjure once
by closing your eyes and
sleeping, except that dreams
fired their figments
across space at you
and your muscles straining

While we live
we pick one of these options
to live by, and neither is understood
the way the robin in the tree is
who speaks to us of March lust,
the way water and clouds are
which tell us to walk out
into the day, how to step
on grass and mud and feel the pull
upward and then sag an hour later
down, we with our little time
and our ideas and our blood.

(David Zieroth [source])

…and:

Picasso is riding on a train and someone sits down next to him.

Recognizing who he is, the person asks, “Why don’t you paint people the way they really are?”

Picasso asks, “What do you mean by the way they really are?”

The man eagerly pulls out his wallet and shows Picasso a picture of his wife and says, “This is my wife.”

Picasso responds, “She looks rather small and flat, don’t you think?”

(Bonnie Myotai Treace, Sensei [source: unknown for now, but the same story in different words is here])

From elsewhere:

“You play pool?” [congressman Boyette] asked.

[Galaxy, his paid escort, said,] “I could kick your ass any night, Spanky.”

“Well, listen to this. The woke police are trying to get all the eight balls changed from black to rainbow-colored!”

Galaxy rolled her eyes. “Who said that?”

“Fox.”

“Who on Fox?”

“Judge Jeanine,” said Boyette.

Galaxy let out a hoot. “I’m going to pretend you know that’s total bullshit.”

“No, it’s not. She says they’ve got Washington lobbyists putting pressure on all the billiard companies.”

Galaxy said, “You find more dumb ways to kill a vibe than any guy I’ve ever been with.”

(Carl Hiaasen [source])

…and:

Song for Autumn

Don’t you imagine the leaves dream now
how comfortable it will be to touch
the earth instead of the
nothingness of air and the endless
freshets of wind? And don’t you think
the trees, especially those with
mossy hollows, are beginning to look for

the birds that will come – six, a dozen – to sleep
inside their bodies? And don’t you hear
the goldenrod whispering goodbye,
the everlasting being crowned with the first
tuffets of snow? The pond
stiffens and the white field over which
the fox runs so quickly brings out
its long blue shadows. The wind wags
its many tails. And at evening
the piled firewood shifts a little,
longing to be on its way.

(Mary Oliver [source])

…and:

Once upon a time, all the professors disappeared, swallowed and digested by a new system. All the centers of learning closed because they were outmoded, and their sites were converted into living quarters swarming with wise, well-organized people who were incapable of creating anything new.

Knowledge was an item that could be bought and sold. A device called the IWM 1000 had been invented. It was the ultimate invention: it brought an entire era to an end. The IWM 1000 was a very small machine, the size of an old scholarly briefcase. It was very easy to use-lightweight and affordable to any person interested in knowing anything. The IWM 1000 contained all human knowledge and all the facts of all the libraries of the ancient and modern world…

With the IWM 1000, you could write any type of literature, compose music, and even paint pictures. Creative works were disappearing because anybody, with time and sufficient patience, could make any work similar to and even superior to one made by artists of the past without having to exert the brain or feel anything strange or abnormal.

Lovers would make the machines conjugate all the tenses of the verb to love, and they would listen to romantic songs. In offices and administrative buildings tape-recorded orders were given, and the IWM 1000 would complete the details of the work. Many people got in the habit of talking only to their own machines; therefore, nobody contradicted them because they knew how the machine was going to respond, or because they believed that rivalry could not exist between a machine and a human being. A machine could not accuse anyone of ignorance: they could ask anything.

(Alicia Yáñez Cossío [source: “The IWM 1000,” from 1975!])

…and:

My Autumn Leaves

I watch the woods for deer as if I’m armed.
I watch the woods for deer who never come.
I know the hes and shes in autumn
rendezvous in orchards stained with fallen
apples’ scent. I drive my car this way to work
so I may let the crows in corn believe
it’s me their caws are meant to warn,
and snakes who turn in warm and secret caves

they know me too. They know the boy
who lives inside me still won’t go away.
The deer are ghosts who slip between the light
through trees, so you may only hear the snap
of branches in the thicket beyond hope.
I watch the woods for deer, as if I’m armed.

(Bruce Weigl [source])

Share

What You See May Not Be What You Get

by Leave a Comment

[Image: “Parked Car, Small Town Main Street” (1932), by Walker Evans. Found this here, at the Web site of the Portland Museum of Art.]

From whiskey river’s commonplace book:

The Seeker’s List of Things to Do

1. Fall and rise a thousand times if need be.

2. Become a habitual seeker.

3. Give up, then try again.

4. Realize that you want to help others.

5. Be thankful.

6. Become a decent human animal.

7. Look for the source of thoughts.

8. Look in whatever way keeps your attention.

9. Will to do one thing — one iron in the fire.

10. Find a teacher(s).

11. Always desire more, never be content.

12. Surround yourself with fellow seekers.

13. Spend time alone.

14. Know that the Hound of Heaven is real. [see note below]

(Shawn Nevins [source])

…and:

This is an example of the diverse responses that an object may elicit. The object is a book. To an animal, it appears as an oddly shaped black and white object. A primitive human being would see a rectangular flexible object with curious markings. To a Western child it is a book, while to an adult it may be a particular type of book, say, a book that makes incomprehensible, even ridiculous claims about reality. Finally, to a physicist, it may be a profound text on quantum physics.

This example illustrates that all the observers are partly correct in what they see, but all except the trained physicist are unaware of how much more meaningful and significant the object is than they can recognize. To the non physicist adult it is a book that seems incomprehensible — even ridiculous. What this example demonstrates is that when we cannot comprehend higher levels of significance, we can blithely believe that we have fully understood something whose true significance we have completely missed. The more subtle, profound depths tend to be overlooked — and what is crucial to understand is that we will not even recognize that we are overlooking these more profound depths of meaning.

This occurs because the higher levels of significance are lost… As [Buddhist economist E.F.] Schumacher pointed out:

Facts do not carry labels indicating the appropriate level at which they ought to be considered. Nor does the choice of an inadequate level lead the intelligence into factual error or logical contradiction. All levels of significance — up to the adequate level, i.e., up to the level of meaning in the example of the book, are equally factual, equally logical, equally objective, but not equally real… When the level of the knower is not adequate to the level of the object of knowledge, the result is not factual error but something much more serious — an inadequate and impoverished view of reality.

This raises an arresting question: what higher levels of significance, what profound meanings and messages, does the world give us that we are overlooking?

(Roger Walsh, edited by Helen Palmer [source (in somewhat different form)])

…and (last paragraph):

In America people do not look at each other publicly much…

I remember my first experience as a café sitter in Europe. There is staring that startles the American. I tried to analyze it and came out with the realization that the European interested is really interested in just ordinary people and makes a study of a man with his eyes in public. What a pleasure and an art it was to study back, and a relief to me as a young more or less educated American, with still echoing in the mind his mother’s “Don’t stare!” (I still cannot point at anything in public.) But I stare and stare at people, shamelessly…

Stare. It is the way to educate your eye, and more. Stare, pry, listen, eavesdrop. Die knowing something. You are not here long.

(Walker Evans [source])

From elsewhere:

Everything in this world which seems to lack harmony is in reality the limitation of man’s own vision. The wider the horizon of his observation becomes, the more harmony of life he enjoys. In the very depth of man’s being the harmony of the working of the whole universe is summed up in a perfect music.

(Hazrat Inayat Khan [source])

…and (excerpt):

Trance Essay for Remembering Images

Someone I was hoping to kiss informed me
that it’s easy to remember

images (all you have to do, they said, is take
a lesson from a children’s book, one in which a girl could

remember anything she wanted by saying “click,”
and imagining she held a camera).

(Diana Hamilton [source])

…and:

Old Jewish joke:

The celebrated rabbi is on his deathbed. His students are lined up in order of seniority to pay their respects, awaiting his final words with bated breath. Eventually, and with effort, the rabbi opens his eyes, then addresses his most senior student. ‘Life,’ he declares, ‘is a river.’ The student turns to the next most senior, and the message gets carried down the line: ‘The rabbi says life is a river.’ ‘The rabbi says life is a river.’ Only the most junior student, the last to receive the words, is naive enough to venture a question. ‘But what does the rabbi mean, “life is a river”?’ The query comes back up the line, until the senior student, trembling at the audacity of questioning the master, manages to blurt it out. ‘My rabbi, I’m sorry, but what do you mean, “life is a river”?’

The old man is moments from expiring. But for one last time, he opens his eyes, and regards the student in unblinking silence. Then he shrugs, and turns up his palms.

‘All right,’ he says. ‘So it’s not a river!’

(Oliver Burkeman [source])

…and:

The United States Welcomes You

Why and by whose power were you sent?

What do you see that you may wish to steal?

Why this dancing? Why do your dark bodies

Drink up all the light? What are you demanding

That we feel? Have you stolen something? Then

What is that leaping in your chest? What is

The nature of your mission? Do you seek

To offer a confession? Have you anything to do

With others brought by us to harm? Then

Why are you afraid? And why do you invade

Our night, hands raised, eyes wide, mute

As ghosts? Is there something you wish to confess?

Is this some enigmatic type of test? What if we

Fail? How and to whom do we address our appeal?

(Tracy K. Smith [source])

____________

Note about “the Hound of Heaven”: I’m embarrassed to confess how deep and complex was the rabbit hole down which this phrase led me. When I tracked down the source of the whiskey river quotation, I found this note about the “hound” in question:

Refers to the poem by Francis Thompson. There is something calling you – God, Rose’s Invisible Current, or the Voice of the Silence. Become aware of your intuition (heart), your hunger and yearning for certainty. You hide with endless diversions from your hunger and yearning. You fill the emptiness in you with material goods, or even love. Yet, you are truly, always alone. There is simply you and a haunting question that sooner or later you must confront.

So then of course I wanted to learn something about the poem in question — and then to figure out what “Rose’s Invisible Current” referred to, and the Voice of the Silence, ditto, and— well, as I said, it kept branching and branching and branching… Maybe this was the lesson of the whole post today!

[back]

Share

See the Mountain… Ask the Questions… Watch for Answers

by Leave a Comment

[Video: “Mars in 4K: The Ultimate Edition,” compiled from the NASA originals by an independent filmmaker who runs a Patreon project dubbed “ElderFox Documentaries.” The video’s description as posted at YouTube says: “A few years ago I threw together some Mars images and rendered them in 4k. Back then, I had little editing knowledge. The video went on to get over 60 million views. It was something that hadn’t been done before, and was a case of the right place at the right time. I’m not expecting this video to come close to the view count of the original, but I just wanted to do it justice and give you all something nice to watch.”]

From whiskey river’s commonplace book (italicized portion):

My eleven-year-old son came to me recently and in a tone of patient suffering, asked, “How much longer do I have to go to school?”

“About fifteen years,” I said.

“Oh! Lord,” he said despondently. “Do I have to?”

“I ’m afraid so. It’s terrible and I’m not going to try to tell you it isn’t. But I can tell you this — if you are very lucky, you may find a teacher and that is a wonderful thing.”

“Did you find one?”

“I found three,” I said.

It is customary for adults to forget how hard and dull school is. The learning by memory all the basic things one must know is the most incredible and unending effort. Learning to read is probably the most difficult and revolutionary thing that happens to the human brain and if you don’t believe that watch an illiterate adult try to do it. School is not so easy and it is not for the most part very fun, but then, if you are very lucky, you may find a teacher. Three real teachers in a lifetime is the very best of luck. I have come to believe that a great teacher is a great artist and that there are as few as there are any other great artists. Teaching might even be the greatest of the arts since the medium is the human mind and spirit.

(John Steinbeck [source])

…and:

Advice? I don’t have advice. Stop aspiring and start writing. If you’re writing, you’re a writer. Write like you’re a goddamn death row inmate and the governor is out of the country and there’s no chance for a pardon. Write like you’re clinging to the edge of a cliff, white knuckles, on your last breath, and you’ve got just one last thing to say, like you’re a bird flying over us and you can see everything, and please, for God’s sake, tell us something that will save us from ourselves.

Take a deep breath and tell us your deepest, darkest secret, so we can wipe our brow and know that we’re not alone. Write like you have a message from the king. Or don’t. Who knows, maybe you’re one of the lucky ones who doesn’t have to.

(Alan Watts [source: nothing canonical; quoted in various forms here and there, e.g. here])

…and:

Deep down, all of us are probably aware that some kind of mystical evolution is our true task. Yet we suppress the notion with considerable force because to admit it is to admit that most of our political gyrations, religious dogmas, social ambitions, and financial ploys are not merely counter-productive but trivial.

(Tom Robbins [source])

From elsewhere:

I might say: if the place I want to reach could only be climbed up to by a ladder, I would give up trying to get there. For the place to which I really have to go is one that I must actually be at already.

Anything that can be reached with a ladder does not interest me.

(Ludwig Wittgenstein [source])

…and:

Counting, This New Year’s Morning, What Powers Yet Remain to Me

The world asks, as it asks daily:
And what can you make, can you do, to change my deep-broken, fractured?

I count, this first day of another year, what remains.
I have a mountain, a kitchen, two hands.

Can admire with two eyes the mountain,
actual, recalcitrant, shuffling its pebbles, sheltering foxes and beetles.

Can make black-eyed peas and collards.
Can make, from last year’s late-ripening persimmons, a pudding.

Can climb a stepladder, change the bulb in a track light.

For four years, I woke each day first to the mountain,
then to the question.

The feet of the new sufferings followed the feet of the old,
and still they surprised.

I brought salt, brought oil, to the question. Brought sweet tea,
brought postcards and stamps. For four years, each day, something.

Stone did not become apple. War did not become peace.
Yet joy still stays joy. Sequins stay sequins. Words still bespangle, bewilder.

Today, I woke without answer.

The day answers, unpockets a thought from a friend

don’t despair of this falling world, not yet

didn’t it give you the asking

(Jane Hirshfield [source])

…and:

# 999, or Thereabouts (Epilogue)

Keep walking. Just keep walking: as fast as you can, no faster. (Perhaps it’s not walking, as such… No: it’s definitely not walking, as such…) Maybe you go just a few steps, and then you have to rest; maybe you can go a mile before stopping to catch your breath. Should a passerby offer a lift, and you feel like talking, ride with them for a distance — take a load off. And then when your paths diverge, walk some more. Walk. Walk…

There will come a time when you walk for just two steps, before needing to rest. And then you will walk just one more step, and need to rest again. And perhaps if you’re lucky, there will be a bench (no luck involved, there’s always a bench), and you can rest on the bench, and say honestly and without regret: I’ve walked enough.

Look back the way you came then. How far you’ve walked! How much higher you are now than when you started! You didn’t even realize you were ascending — it was just putting one foot ahead of the other, over and over…

Close your eyes. Remember the first hundred steps. Remember that odd building you passed, the one with the funny turrets, and the first passerby who stopped for you and that strange story they shared — what was it, something about a pet chinchilla? — and that stand of willows in the middle of the field, by the little creek, and the way the startlingly purple sun rose on the first day after the first night you slept in the open. Remember the one-thousandth one hundred steps, the bus station you passed, with all the waiting taxis… the older driver who stopped to talk but did not offer you a ride… That first night it rained…

Rest.

Rest.

Rest.

Rest… and always, always remember.

(JES, Maxims for Nostalgists)

Share

Glancing at All the Worldly Immortalities, and Then Moving On

by Leave a Comment

[Image: “I Came to Pass, But Not to Stay,” by John E. Simpson. (Photo shared here under a Creative Commons License; for more information, see this page at RAMH.)]

From whiskey river’s commonplace book:

There is a joy in the actual taste of vanilla ice cream that does not come from knowing the chemical formula of vanilla. There is a joy, an inherent aliveness in the body that you can experience if you pay attention to your body. But if you live up in your head, in your words all the time, you don’t notice it.

(Charles T. Tart [source])

…and:

1.) We judge matters so superficially that ordinary acts and words, done and spoken with some flair and some knowledge of worldly matters, often succeed better than the greatest cleverness.

2.) To be too dissatisfied with ourselves is a weakness. To be too satisfied with ourselves is a stupidity.

3.) Mean-spirited mediocrities, especially those with a smattering of learning, are the most likely to be opinionated. Only strong minds know how to correct their opinions and abandon a bad position.

4.) Wealth does not teach us to transcend the desire for wealth. The possession of many goods does not bring the repose of not desiring them.

5.) We so love all new and unusual things that we even derive a secret pleasure from the saddest and most tragic events, both because of their novelty and because of the natural malignity that exists within us.

6.) There is no one who cannot derive great help and great benefit from learning; but there are also only a few people who do not receive a great harm from the light and knowledge they have received by learning, unless they use their knowledge in a manner both fit and natural for them.

7.) Self-love is even deceived by self-love, because by looking out for our own interests and disregarding those of other people, we lose the advantage that comes with the exchange of favors.

8.) Often the desire to appear competent impedes our ability to become competent, because we are more anxious to display our knowledge than to learn what we do not know.

(From the Maxims of Madame de Sablè, translated from the French by Arthur Chandler [source: nothing canonical, but pieces of it floating around here and there])

From elsewhere:

He looked up at the empty clouds, and as he died he wondered, not for the first time but for the very last, why it should be that we are made for a bright world, but live in a dark one.

(Lev Grossman [source])

…and:

The big house stood as firmly rooted in the soil of Denmark as the peasants’ huts, and was as faithfully allied to her four winds and her changing seasons, to her animal life, trees and flowers. Only its interests lay in a higher plane. Within the domain of the lime trees it was no longer cows, goats, and pigs on which the minds and the talk ran, but horses and dogs. The wild fauna, the game of the land, that the peasant shook his fist at when he saw it on his young green rye or in his ripening wheat field, to the residents of the country houses were the main pursuit and the joy of existence.

The writing in the sky solemnly proclaimed continuance, a worldly immortality. The great country houses had held their ground through many generations. The families who lived in them revered the past as they honoured themselves, for the history of Denmark was their own history.

(Isak Dinesen [source])

…and:

Day Beginning with Seeing the International Space Station and a Full Moon over the Gulf of Mexico and All Its Invisible Fishes

None of this had to happen.
Not Florida. Not the ibis’s beak. Not water.
Not the horseshoe crab’s empty body and not the living starfish.
Evolution might have turned left at the corner and gone down another street entirely.
The asteroid might have missed.
The seams of limestone need not have been susceptible to sand and mangroves.
The radio might have found a different music.
The hips of one man and the hips of another might have stood beside
each other on a bus in Aleppo and recognized themselves as long-lost brothers.
The key could have broken off in the lock and the nail-can refused its lid.
I might have been the fish the brown pelican swallowed.
You might have been the way the moon kept not setting long after we thought it would,
long after the sun was catching inside the low wave curls coming in
at a certain angle. The light might not have been eaten again by its moving.
If the unbearable were not weightless we might yet buckle under the grief
of what hasn’t changed yet. Across the world a man pulls a woman from the water
from which the leapt-from overfilled boat has entirely vanished.
From the water pulls one child, another. Both are living and both will continue to live.
This did not have to happen. No part of this had to happen.

(Jane Hirshfield [source])

Share

And Then Another Thing Happened

by Leave a Comment

[Image: one of the myriad dreams depicted in Roz Chast’s graphic novel (for lack of a better term), I Must Be Dreaming.]

From whiskey river’s commonplace book:

Sometimes one sees the world in a way one is not aware of at other times. We’re never really seeing the world, we’re only seeing a moment’s take on the world. This is true of images. Images are a way of seeing the world which you didn’t notice before, and something you cannot make by an act of will; it’s something that is suddenly revealed to you. The world has layers, and you start seeing that these layers happen all at once; they’re all together. I think that’s what is startling about images. At the moment of seeing, they seem so obvious. Why didn’t I see that before? Mandelstam wrote wonderfully about images. He said that an image is not an act of will. A real image is something that occurs to you. He said an image is like running across a river on a bridge of boats, and when you get to the other side, you look back and see that all the boats have moved or drifted and are in different places, and you realize it would be impossible to do all over again. That’s always seemed like a great image right there.

(W.S. Merwin [source])

…and:

There was also another reason why it was now possible to paint. It was because there was one central fact that made it seem worthwhile going on, whatever the objective value of the pictures to other people. It was that I had discovered in the painting a bit of experience that made all other occupations unimportant by comparison. It was the discovery that when painting something from nature there occurred, at least sometimes, a fusion into a never-before-known wholeness; not only were the object and oneself no longer felt to be separate, but neither were thought and sensation and feeling and action towards it, the movement of one’s hand together with the feeling of delight in the “thusness“ of the thing, they all seemed fused into a wholeness of being which was different than anything else that had ever happened to me.

(Marion Milner [source])

…and (in slightly different form):

If we are honest, many of us consider ourselves to be rather lazy, still haunted by those school reports that said “Must try harder!” So it might surprise you if I suggest that much of what we do comes unstuck not because we don’t try hard enough, but because we try too hard, or at least try too hard in the wrong sort of way. We aim too high, too quickly, being prematurely concerned with correctness and results at the expense of practice and process. Since in the short term this offers little chance of success — and it is hard to sustain something we do not feel any good at — we soon feel disheartened and give up before we have really started…

Where does this perfectionist task-master come from? I suspect it is the highly toxic combination of a lack of confidence and a subtle sense of unworthiness. Playing inside our heads is a running commentary continually telling us that we cannot think what we think, or do what we do, because it is either wrong or not good enough: a voice amplified by moral teachings that places all the emphasis on guilt and sin. So instead of wholeheartedly embracing things, as is our birthright, we snatch at life in a sort of smash-and-grab raid before those in authority deem us impostors and ask us to leave, preferably by the back door.

(Manjusvara [source])

From elsewhere:

Every proof the writer thinks up in support of the story’s larger elements will have its own implications and exert its own subtle pressure on the story. The old slave he invented in support of [Helen of Troy’s] character, if she’s to do the work required of her (motivate Helen), must be a vivid and interesting character; otherwise we cannot understand why her influence should be so powerful. But once a vivid and interesting character has been introduced, he or she cannot simply be dropped, forgotten henceforward. Once the character is gone—hanged, let us say—we miss the character; or, to put it another way, we expect the character’s return, at least in Helen’s memory. It will not be sufficient, the writer will find, simply to mention the old slave’s name from time to time. Though her work for the story is done, she must come back, at least briefly, and the question is: What is she to do when she comes back? She can’t just stand there. Forced by the necessity of his story to bring her back and provide her with some action, however brief, the writer is forced to think up some further meaning for the character… It is partly in this way that the fictional process forces the writer to say more than he thought he could; that is, to make discoveries.

(John Gardner [source])

…and:

Listen, God love everything you love—and a mess of stuff you don’t. But more than anything else, God love admiration.

You saying God vain? I ast.

Naw, she say. Not vain, just wanting to share a good thing. I think it pisses God off if you walk by the color purple in a field somewhere and don’t notice it.

What it do when it pissed off? I ast.

Oh, it make something else. People think pleasing God is all God care about. But any fool living in the world can see it always trying to please us back.

Yeah? I say.

Yeah, she say. It always making little surprises and springing them on us when us least suspect.

(Alice Walker [source])

…and:

On the Fifth Day

On the fifth day
the scientists who studied the rivers
were forbidden to speak
or to study the rivers.

The scientists who studied the air
were told not to speak of the air,
and the ones who worked for the farmers
were silenced,
and the ones who worked for the bees.
Someone, from deep in the Badlands,
began posting facts.
The facts were told not to speak
and were taken away.
The facts, surprised to be taken, were silent.
Now it was only the rivers
that spoke of the rivers,
and only the wind that spoke of its bees,
while the unpausing factual buds of the fruit trees
continued to move toward their fruit.
The silence spoke loudly of silence,
and the rivers kept speaking
of rivers, of boulders and air.
Bound to gravity, earless and tongueless,
the untested rivers kept speaking.
Bus drivers, shelf stockers,
code writers, machinists, accountants,
lab techs, cellists kept speaking.
They spoke, the fifth day,
of silence.

(Jane Hirshfield [source])

Share
Verified by MonsterInsights